Analyzing the Supreme Court Decision on Trump’s Muslim Ban
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Justice Roberts and joined by Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch to uphold the latest iteration of the Muslim Ban. This means that the case returns to the lower court for additional litigation but the Muslim Ban will remain in effect for the foreseeable future.
What You Need to Know about Trump’s Muslim Ban After SCOTUS
This Question & Answers page is designed to answer your questions in regard to Trump’s Muslim Ban 3.0 after the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold it on June 26th.
NIAC Outraged by Supreme Court Decision Upholding Muslim Ban
“The effort to end the Muslim Ban is far from over. We will do everything in our power to organize our community and collaborate with other communities to ensure that Trump’s shameful policy is repealed by Congress.”
NIAC and the Coalition’s Fight Against the Muslim Ban
Today, after a more than a year of fighting back against the Muslim Ban, our community finally got our day in the highest court in the United States, which will decide whether a Muslim Ban will become the official immigration policy of our country.
NIAC Frustrated with Muslim Ban Being Allowed Back into Effect
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Shayan Modarres Email: [email protected] Phone: (407) 408-0494 Washington, D.C. – The National Iranian American Council (“NIAC”) issued the following statement on the heels of a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States moments ago to lift injunctions in the Fourth and Ninth Circuits, allowing the Trump administration to implement […]
New Muslim Ban Imminent
The Trump administration’s Muslim ban could be replaced with a new ban as early as today.
NIAC Joins Amicus Brief to Protect Immigrants’ Citizenship
Washington, DC – NIAC has joined 73 other organizations to file an amicus brief in a case before the U.S. Supreme Court that threatens to allow the government to strip individuals of their U.S. citizenship for making minor, immaterial misstatements during the immigration process. Traditionally, stripping naturalized citizens of their citizenship has been reserved for individuals who lie about involvement in terrorism or genocide rather than minor immaterial misstatements.